Judgment Day Has Come

 November 2nd has finally arrived and tomorrow morning we will likely find out whether or not this date has lived up to the hype by conservatives everywhere. If you have not gone out to vote yet, I encourage you to do so. But I doubt there will be very many Democrats voting today except for their more hardcore supporters. A college professor I had once asked me, "Why is it that we see such low voter turn out?" I replied, "Because voting is a right and not a privilege. If more people had to earn their right to vote, they would exercise it more often." While I am not advocating that people should have to earn their right to vote, I am simply saying that people do not find motivation to do something unless they feel like they have earned the right to do it or they are being threatened.

There is a huge enthusiasm gap this election and we are seeing conservatives energized for the first time since 1994 as they face the prospect of another 2 years under a socialist president and congress. It's a truly frightening prospect and it is turning out those "angry white males" more than ever. And, according to Pennsylvanian Governor Ed Rendell the Democrats have blacks, latinos, gays, and lesbians energized to continue down the road to socialism. As laughable as Rendell's statements are, it is eerie just how misinformed and naive voters are. On Fox News today, they interviewed a woman who admitted she had voted for Harry Reid because he "has been in the Senate a long time." She didn't know his positions, beliefs or anything he stood for but she believed that just because he served in the Senate for a "long time" that qualifies him for reelection.

Then, there are the more educated voters like John Powers of New Jersey who explains, "I've never felt as much despair as I do right now...I think we are at the lowest point in our country we have ever been at...When 62 percent of the public said they didn't want the health care law, Pelosi said 'I don't care.'" (Source) Informed voters make informed decisions and there should be a hell of a lot more John Powers out there and a lot less of the people like that Reid supporter on Fox News. We take voting for granted in this country and there are a lot of people out there pulling the lever for candidates that they know nothing about. All I ask is that before you vote, be informed! Understand where each of those politicians stand and if you don't like where either of them stand, opt for a third party candidate. But if you are just voting for the sake of voting and know nothing about the state of this country or the politics of the candidates, do the country a favor and stay home.

Give Something More Than Candy

I won't be around for a few days so I wanted to wish you all a happy and safe Halloween. It's my favorite holiday of the entire year (yes, even over Christmas) and I always love celebrating it in new and exciting ways. In the meantime, if you are feeling generous enough to give something besides candy to kids, please head over to Blackfive and help them raise money for Project Valour-IT (you can donate here). Project Valour-IT, in memory of SFC William V. Ziegenfuss, helps provide voice-controlled/adaptive laptop computers and other technology to support Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines recovering from hand wounds and other severe injuries.

The Patriot's Toolbox

With the Republicans slated to take the House and maybe even the Senate, the Heartland Institute wanted to make sure that they didn't arrive there without some guiding principles. After all, how often do we see politicians on both sides of the aisles stray from the promises and do the work of the highest bidder? Far too often, that's how much. Therefore, the Heartland Institute has published "The Patriot's Toolbox: Eighty Principles for Restoring Our Freedom and Prosperity." It tackles all the major election cycle issues like health care, the environment, energy, school reform, the economy, and privatization. But this is not just campaign rhetoric but actual facts and figures that will allow the new wave of Republican leaders to actually present their logical and reasonable arguments to the public. I can easily see this as becoming our generation's "Common Sense." Here are some excerpts:

Health care is a service, not a right. (pg. 12-13)
"Much of the debate over health care policy begins with two mistaken notions, first that health care is different than other goods and services and therefore does not respond to normal economic rules, and second that it is 'too important' to be entrusted to the anonymous forces of markets."

"Health care is too important to be left in the hands of government bureaucracies that often are unaccountable and unreliable. We need greater reliance on markets and normal economic forces, not less, because health care is so important to so many people (Wilson 1989)."

Allow parents to choose. (pg. 87)
"The current system of school finance is based on the notion that 'local government agents make better school assignments for individual children they have never met than would the family, even were the family to be supported by professional counseling' (Coons and Sugarman 1978 rev. 1999, 47). But this is patently untrue. Parents are more likely to know their children’s individual needs and concerns, and they have much stronger incentives to choose the right schools for their children than bureaucrats do. Parents usually care deeply about their children and may anticipate having to rely on them in their old age (Bast and Walberg 2004)."

Above all else, keep taxes low. (pg. 211)
"Adam Smith, the great English philosopher and economist whose works the Founders studied, taught that 'taxes should be levied only to support a limited government and should satisfy four maxims: equity, transparency, convenience, and efficiency. According to Smith, nations that maintain free markets and limited taxes will maximize their wealth' (Walton 2003)."

Create a transparent and accountable budget. (pg. 216)
"The sole purpose of collecting taxes is to finance the core functions of state government. But few states have budget processes in place that enable legislators to identify those functions and measure the performance of state agencies.

Key elements of a transparent and accountable budget process include the following (Evergreen Freedom Foundation 2005):
- Adopt a meaningful tax and spending limit to frame the budget debate
- Enact a non-partisan revenue forecast process to project budget revenue;
- Utilize performance-based budgeting to make “build or buy” decisions; and
- Utilize independent and comprehensive performance audits with results reported directly to the public."

You can order a free paperback copy for yourself here or you can always download the PDF if you prefer a digital version. It is truly a great read and you won't regret the afternoon spent with it.

Who Are The Real Nazis?

Germany's Chancellor, Angela Merkel, stirred up a real storm recently with her comments on Germany's melting pot society. On Germany, Ms. Merkel said, "the beginning of the 1960s our country called the foreign workers to come to Germany and now they live in our country. We kidded ourselves a while. We said: 'They won't stay, [after some time] they will be gone,' but this isn't reality. And of course, the approach [to build] a multicultural [society] and to live side by side and to enjoy each other ... has failed, utterly failed." (Source) Immediately after reading this, I could feel the coming accusations of Nazism and antisemitism for Merkel.

Germany has paid dearly for the sins of its past and has kidded itself that multiculturalism will work. The Germans, short on labor during the Cold War because of the East/West divide began to import cheap labor from Southern Europe and Turkey. Then, in the 1990s, the Balkan Conflict brought a wave of Islamic refugees. All the while, Germans told themselves that these people would integrate into society and everything would be okay. They believed these people would adopt German customs, speak the German language, wave the German flag, and defend the country from its enemies. Instead, they have seen as the immigrant community remains loyal to its roots and shuns anyone who dares go through "Germanisation."

 Europe has shown a growing trend of anti-immigration sentiment and anti-Islamization with many right leaning parties winning elections due to the failure of multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is a myth of a bygone era that college professors continue to try and cram down the throats of their students. They believe that cultures do not class and can exist peacefully without adopting the traits of the nation they live in. But the reality is that we live in a post-Napoleonic world where nationalism has ended any notions of having an integrated, non-nationalistic society that coexists peacefully.

Geert Wilders, one of the most prominent anti-immigration European politicians, recently went to Berlin to encourage the Germans to establish an anti-immigration party of their own. To the crowd he said, "The crimes of the Nazi era are not an excuse for you to refuse to fight for your own identity. Your only responsibility is to avoid the mistakes of the past." For Wilders, the mistake of the interwar years was the failure to identify gathering threats against democracy. Wilders correctly identifies that it is the Muslims who are the Nazis in today's society. (Source) And while they may not wear militaristic uniforms, goosestep in formation, or wear swastikas, the Islamic fundamentalist immigrants of our generation do try to force their beliefs and laws down our throats while simultaneously indoctrinating future generations with deception. For those that refuse to conform to their standards, they believe, like all fascists, that death is the only answer.

Update: NAACP on the "Racist" Tea Party

My jaw hurts from dropping so much when it comes to Anderson Cooper but he has once again stunned me as he grilled the hell out of the NAACP leader Ben Jealous. Now, this doesn't change the fact that Cooper is still a left wing mouth piece but it does show that he is not a radical like the NAACP and calls bull when he sees it.

The most interesting part of the interview to me is when Cooper asks, 'If a Communist went to a liberal rally, would it be fair to say all liberals are Communists?' Cooper knows full well that a liberal rally attracts only more radical elements as their attendance alone scares off any moderate liberals. Therefore, this sounds just like his attempt to set the standard that you are not entirely who supports you.

Let's clear the air here. When a racist, homophobe, or nut job attends a Tea Party Rally, they shout them down and let the media know that they do not represent the majority of the beliefs. When a radical, socialist, communist, or 9/11 truther attends a liberal rally, they actually give that moron a podium. This is the difference between the Tea Party and the liberals: common sense.

The NAACP Reads This Blog!?

Apparently I am reaching a broader audience than I thought. The NAACP, losing its last foot to stand on politically, took my "advice" today and shouted racist! Their target was, you guessed it, the Tea Party. They even put together a website with a "report" that racist groups were infiltrating and taking over the Tea Party. Time and time again, it has been proven that the people in a crowd at a Tea Party rally shouting racist and homophobic slurs are actually Democrat supporters.

First, the NAACP making idiots of themselves:

Next, just another of the Democrat plants caught:

You can read all about the liberals planting faux racists and nut jobs at Tea Party rallies here.

As I said before, they are shouting racist because they know they have lost the debate. This country is being dragged down into the gutter by President Obama and his socialist programs. The only way for groups, like the NAACP, that thrive off Democrat support to survive is to keep the Democrats in power through any means necessary. That means they are willing to lie, cheat, and steal this election if we let them. Don't be fooled America, the only racists here are the liberals trying to make this an election about race rather than our expanding deficit, declining economy, waning global influence, luxurious spending, and excess government control.

N.O.W. For Sale

"No self-respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a Party that ignores her sex." - Susan B. Anthony

 Women often hail the Democrats as the party of women and civil rights, though as we know from my previous article, the latter is far from true. And, for those who know their history, the former isn't true either. The Susan B. Anthony Amendment was first proposed in 1878 by Republican Senator Aaron Augustus Sargent of California but was struck down by a Democrat controlled congress; not once, not twice, but four times it failed to pass a Democrat controlled congress. That is, until 1919 when Republicans won a majority in Congress and the bill passed to become the 19th Amendment on August 26, 1920.

So ask yourself, where women's rights are concerned, who is the party that fights for them? We live under this myth that the Democrats have championed and fought for women's rights since the dawn of their party when in-fact, they (and I mean the sexist, racist Democrat Representative Howard Smith) added Women's Rights to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in hopes of getting it defeated by misogynist Democrats. Howard Smith, while claiming to be an advocate of women, had it in his mind that the bill would never pass because of this addition and he was even greeted with laughter while proposing the amendment to the bill. The 1960s are an incredibly powerful decade for the Democrats as they seized upon that year to simultaneously fool African-Americans and women that they were the party for equal rights.

Hmm...I wonder who influenced them back then.

During this turbulent and America changing decade, the National Organization for Women (N.O.W.) was established by 28 men and women seeking to end the perceived gender gap in society. Their mission was largely to push Alice Paul's Equal Rights Amendment which states that men and women shall have equal rights throughout the United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction. While this sounds like a wonderful idea in a world with peace and harmony, its practical applications are just not there and it is, in effect, already in our constitution. Women are guaranteed the same rights and protections as men under the Constitution and when these constitutional rights are violated, they have the same recourse as a man in the civil and criminal courts. In Alice Paul's day, women faced a severe bias that would have violated their constitutional rights but now, no woman would be oppressed in such a way. Our society and media would not tolerate it. N.O.W., in effect, sought to establish a law that we already have but instead would be so vague as it would likely end up denying women dependent wife benefits from Social Security, exemption from the draft, and protection in labor laws for women specific issues (for example, maternity leave).

Thus, N.O.W. has become irrelevant as the Equal Rights Amendment has failed to pass and it only lives on as a dream of radical feminazi college professors. So, where does N.O.W. aim their lobbying skills these days? Abortion, multiculturalism, gay rights, protection of illegal aliens, and social-economic justice. It has become increasingly apparent, especially with the upcoming election in November, that N.O.W. should change their name to the National Organization for Whores as they unabashedly endorse candidates like Jerry Brown of California. After one of his staffers, perhaps even his wife, called Meg Whitman a "whore" and suggested Jerry use that word in his next campaign commercial (to which he replied, "I'm going to use that"), N.O.W. emphatically endorsed Jerry Brown the next day. The same Jerry Brown who also denies that mammograms are necessary for the prevention of breast cancer. When Brown's spokesman was asked whether or not Jerry Brown believes in women getting mammograms to prevent breast cancer, he replied, "He believes in people not getting cancer..." (Source) I'm sure Jerry Brown also believes in stopping war and creating peace on earth but that doesn't make it happen in reality Jerry. What's Brown's medical degree in again? Oh yeah! He doesn't have one!

 

Jerry Brown denies mammograms are effective.

Jerry, being the friend of women's rights that he is, has stated that women should be at home taking care of their kids because then "we'd have fewer social problems." The National Organization for Women is nothing more than a duplicitous operation to attempt and redirect the votes of women toward Democrat candidates while using the guise of fighting for women's rights. California's NOW President Parry Bellasalma is quoted as saying, "that while calling Whitman a 'whore' was a poor choice of words, the description was accurate." (Source)

So, if N.O.W. is not fighting for women's rights, who actually is, if anyone? The bra-burning, radical, socialist and so-called women's rights advocates of the 1960s have been accurately described by Adrienne Royer of BlogHer as, "clinging to the Democratic Party, which has thrown the entire movement under the bus so many times that they look like battered wives returning to abuser husbands." (Source) The feminazis of the left believe that they have the right to dictate who is a feminist and who is not. They believe that if you have a R next to your name as a politician, you are a misogynist. But with the increasing amount of women running for public office with a R next to their name, the feminazi lies are failing to find an audience.

"...women are pragmatists. Since the 1980s, the majority of women voters went with Democrats because they promised to answer problems that plagued America. Those "answers" have failed and bankrupted this country, and women know that they've failed. For the first time ever, the generation in power is leaving the nation in worse shape for their children than they entered it. Women see that and feel that, which is why much of the Tea Party movement is female." - Adrienne Royer

The new conservative feminist movement is proving that you do not need to be pro-choice or a multiculturalist seeking "social justice" just to be a feminist. Instead, it is proving that women are throwing off the shackles and lies of the past 50 years and realizing that the truest advocates of women's rights are those who do not ignore gender in matter of politics. The past, radical feminazi are best described by Elizabeth Fox-Genovese when she explains, "They reject the lived experience of women for the dictates of an abstract ideology unsupported by rational argument." (Source) Men and women should enjoy the same protections and liberties under the laws and, for the most part, we do. And we should never stop fighting for this. But there must be some degree of separation as men and women are in-fact different (if you haven't noticed). In private life, organizations, and business, we must be considered separate and judged on our merits rather than our gender, race, creed or appearance. In public life and under the government, we must be treated the same.